RedactieSDB 
19
A recent article in CNET, written by Amanda Smith, a freelance journalist and writer based in New York City, delves into the world of using artificial intelligence to summarize books, a potential solution for avid readers with ever-growing reading lists.
Smith, who has a goal of reading one book a month, wanted to explore if AI could help her glean key insights from Cal Newport’s book “Deep Work” without investing hours in reading it herself. She chose to test the capabilities of ChatGPT, one of the most well-known AI text prompt tools, using her paid membership to make the most of the tool.
However, Smith’s journey revealed both the challenges and limitations of using AI for book summaries. Due to necessary plagiarism safeguards and respect for intellectual property rights, ChatGPT does not have access to full manuscripts and relies on existing information available online.
This meant that Smith had to carefully craft her prompts and conduct independent research to extract meaningful insights. Despite her efforts, ChatGPT struggled to provide a comprehensive summary, often offering generic advice without considering Smith’s line of work.
Ultimately, while AI tools like ChatGPT show potential in bridging the gap between readers and authors, they are not yet a substitute for the rich experience of engaging with a book in its entirety.
The Quest for Deep Insights
Smith quickly realized that obtaining a comprehensive summary from ChatGPT would require more than a simple prompt.
To avoid plagiarism and respect intellectual property rights, the AI tool does not have access to full manuscripts and relies on existing information available online.
This limitation meant that Smith had to carefully craft her prompts and conduct independent research to extract meaningful insights.
Crafting the Perfect Prompt
Smith’s journey began with setting expectations for ChatGPT. She asked the AI if it had access to the entire book, emphasized her desire for deep insights rather than a superficial summary, and requested suggestions on applying the key strategies to her freelance business.
Additionally, she inquired if the tool could draw from reviews and reader commentary to provide more surprising and actionable takeaways.
However, ChatGPT, bound by its commitment to avoiding plagiarism and respecting intellectual property rights, maintained its integrity by not providing more information than what was freely available online.
The AI tool made it clear that it did not have access to the full manuscript, and instead offered to summarize the book based on existing online information.
Smith, undeterred, attempted to provide ChatGPT with a 6-hour audiobook YouTube clip, hoping it would be sufficient for a comprehensive summary. But once again, the AI tool stood its ground, suggesting that Smith watch the video herself, further demonstrating its dedication to preventing plagiarism.
Faced with these limitations, Smith had to get creative. She scoured through over 32,000 reviews of the book on Amazon, hoping that the wealth of commentary would be enough for ChatGPT to provide an in-depth summary.
She carefully crafted her prompts, stating, “I haven’t read Cal Newport’s book, Deep Work. Highlight the key ideas, concepts, strategies and frameworks, so I can apply to my business as if I’ve read it. I don’t just want a summary of the book.”
Despite her efforts, ChatGPT struggled to interpret “comprehensive,” offering generic advice without considering Smith’s line of work.
Leveraging the Power of Collaboration
Undeterred, Smith pressed on, asking targeted questions to guide ChatGPT towards more valuable insights. She discovered that by doing a quick Google search for key lessons from the book and using those nuggets to frame her prompts, she could effectively direct the AI to expand on specific concepts.
This collaborative approach yielded more promising results, with ChatGPT introducing Smith to the concept of “productive meditation” and elaborating on the idea of keeping a compelling scoreboard.
Throughout this process, ChatGPT remained steadfast in its commitment to providing information based solely on freely available online sources.
The AI tool’s unwavering integrity, even in the face of Smith’s persistent prompts, highlights the importance of the plagiarism safeguards built into these tools.
While these limitations may pose challenges for users seeking comprehensive book summaries, they also serve as a reminder that AI tools are not a replacement for the immersive experience of reading a book in its entirety.
The AI Bridge Builder: Connecting Readers to Authors
While Smith’s experience with ChatGPT didn’t entirely replace the need to read the book herself, it highlighted the potential of AI as a bridge builder between readers and authors.
By providing insights that spark interest and respect the author’s contributions, AI can facilitate a deeper appreciation for the author’s work and encourage readers to explore further.
This respectful connection, forged by AI, has the power to lead to increased readership and engagement with original content. As AI technology continues to evolve, we can look forward to a future where these tools serve not as a replacement for reading, but as a complement that enhances our understanding and appreciation of the written word.
Final Words
Amanda Smith’s journey with ChatGPT in summarizing Cal Newport’s “Deep Work” reveals both the challenges and the potential of using AI to bridge the gap between readers and authors.
While plagiarism safeguards and the need for extensive prompt engineering may pose some obstacles, the collaborative approach between human and machine can yield valuable insights that deepen our understanding of a book’s concepts.
